NEWxSFC - Interim Summary…as of 02 MAR 2009

AVG SUMSQ

AVG STP

AVG Total Absolute

AVG Absolute

Mean RSQ

 

Previous Ranks

Rank

Forecaster

Class

Total STN 4casts

Error (")

Error Z

% MPRV over AVG

Rank

4cast (")

Error

Error Z

% MPRV over AVG

Rank

Error (")

Error Z

% MPRV over AVG

Rank

Error (")

Error Z

%MPRV over AVG

Rank

RSQ

RSQ Z

% MPRV over AVG

Rank

Forecaster

2,1,1,1,1

1

donsutherland1

Chief

116

79

-1.025

53%

2

88.2

9.4

-0.550

46%

5

26.96

-1.171

35%

2

1.37

-1.117

35%

2

75.4%

0.926

33%

3

donsutherland1

5,2,2,3,2

2

shanabe

Senior

118

104

-0.743

34%

5

82.5

22.2

0.099

-7%

8

32.77

-0.765

21%

5

1.62

-0.740

19%

5

71.3%

0.895

29%

4

shanabe

10,6,3,4,3

3

Donald Rosenfeld

Senior

136

104

-0.737

34%

4

94.2

12.8

-0.536

18%

4

35.82

-0.660

15%

5

1.56

-0.817

19%

4

62.2%

0.169

3%

6

Donald Rosenfeld

-,-,-,2,5

4

Raven

Senior

131

129

-0.564

27%

5

94.9

18.4

-0.112

8%

7

40.01

-0.438

11%

6

1.83

-0.469

12%

6

63.5%

0.341

8%

7

Raven

-,-,-,5,7

5

herb @maws

Senior

120

131

-0.310

17%

7

78.9

18.2

-0.219

17%

8

36.87

-0.321

10%

7

1.84

-0.319

11%

6

61.4%

0.189

7%

8

herb@maws

8,-,-,8,6

6

Mitchel Volk

Senior

133

172

-0.204

9%

8

115.2

23.6

0.014

-7%

7

45.41

-0.279

7%

7

2.05

-0.244

6%

7

65.7%

0.359

18%

7

Mitchel Volk

4,4,4,7,8

7

TQ

Senior

117

173

0.083

-4%

9

82.3

26.8

0.455

-36%

10

41.53

-0.072

2%

7

2.05

0.095

-1%

8

63.8%

-0.007

-5%

8

TQ

6,5,5,9,9

8

ilibov

Senior

133

203

0.665

-26%

11

81.4

26.3

0.576

-36%

11

49.03

0.833

-19%

12

2.20

0.536

-10%

10

58.4%

-0.350

-14%

10

ilibov

11,8,6,11,10

9

weatherT

Rookie

111

208

0.790

-37%

12

62.6

31.1

0.597

-51%

10

47.28

0.738

-22%

12

2.64

1.172

-37%

12

59.5%

-0.166

-7%

10

weatherT

14,11,10,14,12

10

jackzig

Senior

127

282

0.884

-44%

11

100.2

21.7

0.040

8%

9

60.57

1.042

-31%

12

2.82

0.958

-27%

12

33.6%

-1.427

-43%

12

jackzig

 

 

There have been eight (8) snowstorm forecasting Contests to date.  Under the ‘two-thirds’ rule…forecasters who have entered at least six (6) forecasts are included in this interim summary.

 

To qualify for ranking in the Interim and final ‘End-of-Season’ standings…a forecaster must enter at least two-thirds of all Contests.  If a forecaster has made more than enough forecasts to qualify for ranking…only the lowest SUMSQ Z-scores necessary to qualify are used in the computing the average.  IOW…if you made nine forecasts…only your six best SUMSQ Z-scores are used to evaluate your season-to-date performance.  You can think of it as dropping the worse quiz score before your final grade is determined.  The reason we have this rule is to 1) make it possible to miss entering a forecast or two throughout the season and still be eligible for Interim and ‘End-of Season’ ranking and 2) encourage forecasters to take on difficult and/or late-season storms without fear about how a bad forecast might degrade their overall 'season-to-date' performance score(s).

 

The mean normalized ‘SUMSQ error’ is the Contest/s primary measure of forecaster performance.  This metric measures how well the forecaster/s expected snowfall 'distribution and magnitude' for _all_ forecast stations captured the 'distribution and magnitude' of _all_ observed snowfall amounts.  A forecaster with a lower average SUMSQ Z Score has made more skillful forecasts than a forecaster with higher average SUMSQ Z Score.
 

The 'Storm Total Precipitation error’ statistic is the absolute arithmetic difference between a forecaster/s sum-total snowfall for all stations and the observed sum-total snowfall.  This metric…by itself…is not a meaningful measure of skill…but can provide additional insight of forecaster bias.

 

The 'Total Absolute error' statistic is the average of your forecast errors regardless of whether you over-forecast or under-forecast.  This metric measures the magnitude of your errors.

 

The 'Average Absolute Error' is the forecaster/s ‘Total Absolute Error’ divided by the number of stations where snow was forecast or observed.

 

The ‘RSQ error’ statistic is a measure of the how well the forecast captured the variability of the observed snowfall.  Combined with the SUMSQ error statistic…RSQ provides added information about how strong the forecaster/s ‘model’ performed.